Thirty days ago you rated yourself on six AI skills. Today you rate yourself again — same six, same scale. Then you see the gap.
I ran the capstone this morning. Gave it a research question. It pulled 5 recent papers via Perplexity, extracted a structured finding from each — claim, authors, year, journal — and returned a markdown mini-review grouped by year. That's a methods section, automatically.
That agent used search, structured extraction, and formatting in one chain. Three weeks ago you were reading 40 abstracts manually over a weekend. Today that same coverage takes two minutes.
I want to see the Day 1 delta.
Same six rows. Rate honestly where you are today. The chart shows both ratings side by side — the gap between Day 1 and now is yours to defend in a methods section: "AI-assisted literature triage using a structured extraction pipeline."
A reviewer asked how I found the non-English papers I cited. I sent them the script.
A reproducible AI pipeline is a citation in itself. That's the point of the whole track.
30 days, 20 AI lessons, 1 literature summariser agent.
| Column | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Left bar | Day 1 self-rating |
| Right bar | Today's rating |
| Gap | Real, measurable growth |
You've completed the researchers trio. Python gave you reproducible analysis. Automation gave you pipelines that run themselves. AI gives you literature at the speed of the field.
Create a free account to get started. Paid plans unlock all tracks.
Thirty days ago you rated yourself on six AI skills. Today you rate yourself again — same six, same scale. Then you see the gap.
I ran the capstone this morning. Gave it a research question. It pulled 5 recent papers via Perplexity, extracted a structured finding from each — claim, authors, year, journal — and returned a markdown mini-review grouped by year. That's a methods section, automatically.
That agent used search, structured extraction, and formatting in one chain. Three weeks ago you were reading 40 abstracts manually over a weekend. Today that same coverage takes two minutes.
I want to see the Day 1 delta.
Same six rows. Rate honestly where you are today. The chart shows both ratings side by side — the gap between Day 1 and now is yours to defend in a methods section: "AI-assisted literature triage using a structured extraction pipeline."
A reviewer asked how I found the non-English papers I cited. I sent them the script.
A reproducible AI pipeline is a citation in itself. That's the point of the whole track.
30 days, 20 AI lessons, 1 literature summariser agent.
| Column | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Left bar | Day 1 self-rating |
| Right bar | Today's rating |
| Gap | Real, measurable growth |
You've completed the researchers trio. Python gave you reproducible analysis. Automation gave you pipelines that run themselves. AI gives you literature at the speed of the field.